Cross examination is, like all other parts of the trial opening, direct examinations and closing, a means by which you argue your case. The purpose of crossexamination is firstly to establish and advance you own and case and secondly to attack the other sides case. Both subsections establish limits within which a trial judge should exercise discretion in maintaining control and order. Read full crossexamination transcripts from excellent personal injury attorneys compiled by patrick malone in the fearless crossexaminer. This article first appeared in the octla gavel, fall 2010. We should know that crossexamination is the most intelligent device evolved by the human civilization, during experience of centuries. Ten tips for direct examination and crossexamination. Are you crossexamining that witness for mistake, bias or corruption. Exposing a lie by ben rubinowitz and evan torgan often, the objective in cross examination is twofold.
Tips for effective crossexamination gentry locke attorneys. Offering a witness for practice cross examination only is illegal, bad and invalid. Everything you need to know about examination of witnesses. Introduction crossexamination is a weapon, an effective weapon if handled correctly and a dangerous weapon if not. Experts are called to consult and to testify by all three parties in child protection casesby the state agency, by the child and by the parents. Witness credibility how to prepare, achieve, and destroy it. Pdf right to crossexamination of witnesses in the case. Culled from the experiences of great trial lawyers, this is the new standard for the art of cross examination. In discussing the methods to employ when crossexamining a witness, let us imagine. Unlike the cross examination of a lay witness which can show that certain testimony is incredible on its face, the cross of an expert witness cannot easily demonstrate that same.
Nacdl powerpoint cross examination theory of the witness. Teaching witnesses to avoid crossexamination traps law360. Lawline offers free cle to help people and companies respond to. Essentially, it consists of breaking down your crossexamination into distinct chapters consisting of the points and subpoints that you want to make for your crossexamination of a particular witness. Are you crossexamining that witness for mistake, bias or. Crossexamination is not a time for the lawyer to grandstand or win a battle of wits with the witness. Law cross examination methods crossexamination evidence, expert analysis expert evidence liability for traffic accidents cases. Ask short, to the point, leading questions this is classical cross. Admissibility of the first kind is governed by ordinary rules of relevancy.
Accordingly, the goal of expert crossexamination is twofold. We provide free public legal information and services, and legal representation and advice to british columbians with low incomes. Title, the art of crossexamination with the crossexaminations of important witnesses in some celebrated cases. Read full cross examination transcripts from excellent personal injury attorneys compiled by patrick malone in the fearless cross examiner. Although cross examination can be the part of trial that is the most fun for experienced trial lawyers, preparing good cross examination takes a lot of thought and hard work. This article provides practical information on techniques for direct examination, cross examination, and impeachment of young witnesses. But in that case, cross merely gives the witness m opportunity to rehabilitate the. Nov 08, 20 an example of our high quality, fieldtested video and associated webbased instructional materials that support individual and group training for lawyers and law students in trial and deposition. The project gutenberg ebook of the art of crossexamination, by. Examination, crossexamination, and redirect examination. The objects of crossexamination of a nonexpert fact witness include the following.
Although crossexamination can be the part of trial that is the most fun for experienced trial lawyers, preparing good crossexamination takes a lot of thought and hard work. Cross examination is not a time for the lawyer to grandstand or win a battle of wits with the witness. Frequently, the client seeking vindication will want precisely that type of crossexamination. The examination and cross examination must relate to relevant facts, but the cross examination need not be confined, to the. One of the most effective tests for the discovery of the truth to test whether the evidence given by a witness is true or not cross examination is not the only way to ascertain the truthfulness of a witness. Examination of witness relevant provisions and case laws. Even so, every detail necessary for effective examination of witnesses cannot be found in a single source. Trial advocacy, crossexamination of a medical expert. Crossexamination scope and limitations subsections b and c of rule 611 specifically address two issues related to the presentation of evidence the scope of crossexamination and the use of leading questions. Pdf right to crossexamination of witnesses in the caselaw. Enliven your witnesses testimony with the use of props. Basic procedure the basic principle of witness testimony is that it must be presented in questionandanswer format, i. Nacdl envisions a society where all individuals receive fair, rational, and humane treatment within the criminal justice system. It usually consists of two kinds of questions 1 those designed to bring out additional facts and details about the events that were not brought out during the direct.
Cross examination is a key component in a trial and the topic is given substantial attention during courses on trial advocacy. Right to crossexamination of witnesses in the caselaw of european human rights court. Judicial discretion the trial judge has broad discretion to control the procedure of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so that the trial furthers three goals. This amounts to a failure of the prosecution to examine the particular witness at the trial. It can be your best friend or your worst enemy if handled incorrectly. Leading questions are designed to keep the witness under control. Cross examination cross examination of witnesses called by the opposing party is an absolute right in both civil and criminal cases. The re examination can be made to explain a matter stated in examination inchief and if some new matter is narrated in re examination the adverse party can again cross examine about new matters. Support the testimony or credibility of one of your witnesses b. This article outlines ten tips for both direct and crossexamination, which certainly is not an exhaustive list.
If youve got something tangible the witness can use to demonstrate a principle, use it. Options for controlling a difficult witness youtube. Although counsel has no more deadly weapon than cross examination, if his objectives are not carefully thought out, the course of the interrogation not properly planned, his strategy visavis the particular witness not determined, and his supporting propositions not well researched, the entire examination may miss its mark. Call 8003427896 for a free consultation with experienced michigan sex crime attorneys who aggressively defend the accused. This article provides practical information on techniques for direct examination, crossexamination, and impeachment of young witnesses. To say, if a man comes to report to a court that he has seen a killing b by shooting with revolver at evening on a particular date. For more trial advocacy tips that will help you persuade. Killer cross examination cooperating witness cross examination by. Crossexamination of eyewitnesses james education center.
My own perspective on crossexamination has recently broadened. Crossexamination of experts presented by barry schu ltz. The crossexamining attorney is bound by the same rules of evidence as the attorney who. These should not be considered rules but rather red flags since experience demonstrates that most mistakes in crossexamination are made when the red flags are disregarded. In discussing the methods to employ when crossexamining a witness, let us.
The author follows the changing nature of the witness into a third phase, which she calls the era of the witness. Mangraviti was the cofounder in 2000 of seaks expert witness directory. The opinions by a jury or judge are often changed during cross examination if doubt is cast on the witness. Crossexamination is a key component in a trial and the topic is given substantial attention during courses on trial advocacy. Who what when where how why questions that begin with any of the above are open ended and. The second, most important, phase is centered on the eichmann trial, which for wieviorka is the moment 1961. Donovan is the coauthor of the text how to write an expert witness. The victim of a crime may not be designated by the state to remain in the courtroom, but may be called as the first witness and then allowed to remain after testifying. Section 5 lays down the order to be followed in production and examination of witnesses which is left to be regulated by the code of civil procedure and criminal procedure. The rules of the game cross examination is the litigators greatest weapon, but properly playing the game requires knowledge of the rules and maximum preparation.
However, keep an eye open for potential areas of cross examination, as this will not only assist in preparing your questions and strategy for direct examination, but also to prepare your fact witnesses for cross. The right to crossexamination and witness protectio n in ethiopia. These should not be considered rules but rather red flags since experience demonstrates that most mistakes in cross examination are made when the red flags are disregarded. Sometimes witnesses especially experts try to take control of the examination by answering with a narrative when this happens, dont argue with the witness or plead with him or her to answer your questions with a yes or no answer. The second category is known as impeachment, and has its own set of rules. Effective crossexamination can make the difference between winning and losing a trial.
Direct and crossexamination law offices of steven c. Like a weapon, it must be treated with respect and understanding. Even in court, however, an expert is free to give a bottom line, provided that the underlying data and reasoning are available on demand. Chapter x of part iii of the indian evidence act, 1872 deals with the examination of a witness. Posted monday, october 21st, 20 by gregory forman filed under litigation strategy, of interest to family court litigants, of interest to general public, south carolina specific. Culled from the experiences of great trial lawyers, this is the new standard for the art of. There is therefore no justification for obstruction of crossexamination by unreasonable interruptions, repeated objections to proper questions, attempts to have the witness change or tailor evidence, or other similar conduct while the examination is ongoing. The cross examination of a child witness in a sex crime case is crucial to your defense. Pdf on feb 1, 2001, t g gutheil and others published personal questions on crossexamination.
Although counsel has no more deadly weapon than crossexamination, if his objectives are not carefully thought out, the course of the interrogation not properly planned, his strategy visavis the particular witness not determined, and his supporting propositions not well researched, the entire examination may miss its mark. One of the hallmarks of contemporary litigation is the ubiquity of expert witness testimony. Its common for inexperienced witnesses to become ensnared in their own responses during crossexamination, so they should be coached in advance on how to. In deposition, crossexamine the witness to summarize and lock in her testimony before trial. In the preceding chapters it was attempted to offer a few suggestions, gathered from experience, for the proper handling of an honest witness who, through ignorance or partisanship, and more or less unintentionally, had testified to a mistaken state of facts injurious to our side of the. Sound judgment, not rules, must determine how the cross examiner approaches each witness. This is the process of questioning your opponents witnesses. Avoid that temptation or the jury will make you and them pay for it.
In the case of s v dlamini and another 2008 1 sacr 501 n, the accused were convicted in the high court of murder. When horsley finished his testimony, richardson began the crossexamination, which was to last for twentysix hours over the course of an. Crossexamining expert witnesses ases are not usually won through an opposing experts testimony. Call 8003427896 for a free consultation with experienced michigan. Nov 07, 2019 its common for inexperienced witnesses to become ensnared in their own responses during crossexamination, so they should be coached in advance on how to break down each questionandanswer. Eliciting positive facts known to the witness that help your case or damage your opponents case. During crossexamination, the eyewitness is unlikely to admit that he could be incorrect. Killer cross examination cooperating witness cross examination by attorney neil. The cross examination is a test to the truthfulness of the witness, to sift, modify, or explain what has been said, to develop new or old facts in a view favorable to the cross examiner, or to discredit the witness, and, if she is the plaintiff, to test hisher good faith, the righteousness of hisher casevi. The appellants argument was that the trial judge had unduly restricted the. After reading the art of cross examination by francis wellman, i was moved to enroll in law school. The crossexamination of richard pigott by sir charles russell.
Lawyers hire experts with the same frequency as manhattanites hail cabs. Are you cross examining that witness for mistake, bias or corruption. Pdf witness impeachment in crossexamination using ad. To accomplish the latter, you have to convince the jury either that the witness is not qualified to give that opinion, or that his testimony should not be believed. Pdf this paper combines methods of argumentation theory and artificial intelligence to extend existing work on the. Firearmstoolmarks examiner september 18, 2011 this project was supported by award no. Rather, they are normally won by your own wellprepared wit nesses. Sound judgment, not rules, must determine how the crossexaminer approaches each witness. The examination of a witness subsequent to cross examination is called re examination. Apr 04, 2008 after reading the art of cross examination by francis wellman, i was moved to enroll in law school. Effective cross examination can make the difference between winning and losing a trial. Crossexamination of witnesses aron, roberto et al on. If an adverse witness has testified favorably to a plainfiffs case, there is the overwhelming temptation to go for the kill, to reiterate that testimony with a brilliant crossexamination.
After reading molo and figliulos, your witness, i want to become a lawyer all over again. Powerpoint cross examination theory of the witness. Sample questions to ask when crossexamining witnesses at a. However, keep an eye open for potential areas of crossexamination, as this will not only assist in preparing your questions and strategy for direct examination, but also to prepare your fact witnesses for cross. This is because, although cross examination is important, it is just one aspect of a multipart trial. Crossexamination is, like all other parts of the trial opening, direct examinations and closing, a means by which you argue your case. Unlike the crossexamination of a lay witness which can show that certain testimony is incredible on its face, the cross of an expert witness cannot easily demonstrate that same. Pdf on jul 26, 2018, mehmet arslan and others published right to crossexamination of witnesses in the caselaw of european human rights court find, read and cite all the research you need on. An example of our high quality, fieldtested video and associated webbased instructional materials that support individual and group training for lawyers and law students in trial and deposition. This is because, although crossexamination is important, it is just one aspect of a multipart trial. Anyone who learns the rules can become a master of the art of crossexamination. The crossexamination is a test to the truthfulness of the witness, to sift, modify, or explain what has been said, to develop new or old facts in a view favorable to the crossexaminer, or to discredit the witness, and, if she is the plaintiff, to test hisher good faith, the righteousness of hisher casevi.
1025 452 1537 717 689 1568 1091 284 633 1108 726 1469 1197 349 298 712 1019 187 1425 189 237 343 1064 1126 301 51 1556 1507 1063 1209 980 1403 674 598 532 110 238 1297 884 327 263